مصالح و سازه های بتنی

مصالح و سازه های بتنی

کاهش مصرف انرژی با به‌کارگیری فوم‌بتن در کف‌سازی ساختمان (مطالعه موردی ساختمانی مسکونی در شهر تهران)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 کارشناس ارشد مهندسی و مدیریت ساخت˓ گروه مهندسی عمران˓ واحد علوم و تحقیقات˓ دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی˓تهران˓ ایران
2 دانشیار و عضو هیئت علمی گروه عمران˓ واحد علوم و تحقیقات˓ دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی˓تهران˓ ایران
چکیده
در کشور ایران به‌منظور ارائه انرژی ارزان‌تر به صنعت و جامعه، بخشی از هزینه‌های تولید انرژی از محل درآمدهای عمومی تأمین می‌گردد. همچنین اتلاف انرژی تولید شده˓ علاوه بر خسارت مالی هنگفت˓ زیان‌های غیرقابل‌انکاری نیز بر محیط‌زیست ملی و جهانی وارد می‌کند. در این پژوهش باهدف بررسى تأثیر مصالح ساختمانی مختلف در میزان مصرف انرژی˓ میزان هدررفت انرژی در یک ساختمان‌ مسکونی با استفاده از نرم‌افزار دیزاین‌بیلدر، بررسی شده است. نتایج نشان داده است که با استفاده از فوم بتن به نسبت استفاده از پوکه معدنی میزان 56/788 کیلووات‌ساعت انرژی (مجموع مصرف برق و گاز) کمتری در سال مصرف شده است. هم چنین در صورت استفاده از فوم بتن به‌جای پوکه معدنی˓ در هر سال می‌توان نزدیک به %1 در میزان هزینه انرژی صرفه‌جویی اقتصادی داشت.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Reducing Energy Consumption by Using Foam Concrete in Building Flooring (A Case Study of a Residential Building in Tehran)

نویسندگان English

amir sina darabi 1
Mehdi ravanshadnia 2
1 MSc in Construction Engineering and Management, Department of Civil Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor and Faculty Member, Department of Civil Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

In Iran, to provide cheaper energy to industry and society, a portion of the energy production costs is subsidized from public revenues. Furthermore, the waste of produced energy, in addition to significant financial losses, causes undeniable damage to the national and global environment. This research, aimed at investigating the impact of different building materials on energy consumption, examines the amount of energy waste in a residential building using DesignBuilder software. The results show that using foam concrete, compared to using pumice, results in 56.788 kWh less energy (total electricity and gas consumption) consumed per year. Also, using foam concrete instead of pumice can result in nearly 1% in economic energy cost savings per year.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Energy
concrete foam
mineral pumice
design builder software
Residental Building
1]   Shahidian A, Riazi F, and Amin A.(2015). "Investigating building energy labels in Iran with the approach of energy consumption management," Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 47-56. [In Persian] https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.16059719.1394.24.3.4.6.
[2]  Soltani M, & Atashi A. (2024). “Second Skin of Facade Impact on Office Building Life Cycle Energy Consumption: A Comparative Study.” International Journal of Architectonic, Spatial, & Environmental Design18(1). http://doi.org/10.18848/2325-1662/CGP/v18i01/117-134   
[3]  Yari nezhad, A. and Mahravan, A. (2024). “Investigating the effect of optimizing external skins and translucent walls on reducing energy consumption and investment return time of educational buildings in a temperate climate with dry and very hot summers.” Journal Of Applied and Computational Sciences in Mechanics36(1), 41-60. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22067/jacsm.2023.81531.1175
[4] Mousavi Navai A, Falavand Jozai A, Ghafouri A, & Mahdavi Adeli M. (2024). “The effect of using air gaps in walls on reducing the energy consumption of a residential building.” New Applied and Computational Findings in Mechanical Systems, 3(3), 56-64 [In Persian].
[5] Ghoddosifar SM, and Asl MF. (2023) "Analyzing the double skin facade moving in the efficiency of energy consumption in residential buildings sustainability in Tabriz city.," J. Sus. Dev. & Env., vol. 3, no. 4, 4, pp. 21-41. [In Persian]  https://civilica.com/doc/1611288.
[6] khayami S, and daneshjoo K. (2022). "The Effect of Dynamic Double Skin Façade on Energy Efficiency in Khayyam Administrative Building," Naqshejahan - Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. [In Persian]   http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1401.12.2.6.8
[7] Feehan A, Nagpal H, Marvuglia A, & Gallagher J. (2021). Adopting an integrated building energy simulation and life cycle assessment framework for the optimisation of facades and fenestration in building envelopes. Journal of Building Engineering, 43, 103138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103138
[8] Ustaoglu A, Yaras A, Sutcu A, and Gencel A.(2021). "Investigation of the residential building having novel environment-friendly construction materials with enhanced energy performance in diverse climate regions: Cost-efficient, low-energy and low-carbon emission," Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 43, p. 102617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102617.
[9] Mirrashid M, and Mirsaeedie L. (2020). "The Effect of Thrombus Wall System on Thermal Comfort in Temperate and Humid Climates (Case study of a residential building in Gonbad Kavous)." J. Env. Sci. Tech, vol. 22. [In Persian]  https://sid.ir/paper/391780/fa.
[10] Fathalian A, and Kargarsharifabad H. (2020). "Investigating the Effect of Different Energy Saving Strategies on Energy Rating of Building by Design Builder Software (Case Study: Office Building)," j. Env. Sci. Tech., vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 199-214. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22034/jest.2019.42973.4590.
[11]  Pedroso M, Flores-Colen, I, Silvestre JD, Gomes MG, Silva L, Sequeira P, & de Brito J. (2020). Characterisation of a multilayer external wall thermal insulation system.  Application in a Mediterranean climate. Journal of Building Engineering, 30, 101265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101265.
[12] Batard A, Duforestel T, Flandin L, & Yrieix B. (2018). Modelling of long-term hygro-thermal behaviour of vacuum insulation panels. Energy and Buildings, 173, 252-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.04.041.
[13] Dutta A, Samanta A, and Neogi S. (2017) "Influence of orientation and the impact of external window shading on building thermal performance in tropical climate," Energy and Buildings, vol. 139, pp. 680-689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.01.018.
[14] Zomorodian ZS, Tahsildoost M. (2016) Validation of Energy Simulation Programs: An Empirical and Comparative Approach. IJE, 18 (4). [In Persian] http://necjournals.ir/article-1-803-fa.html
[15] Witte MJ, Henninger RH, Glazer J, & Crawley DB. (2001). Testing and validation of a new building energy simulation program. Proceedings, Building Simulation, International Building Performance Simulation Association (IBSPA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
[16] Henninger RH, Witte MJ, & Crawley DB. (2003). Experience testing EnergyPlus with the IEA HVAC BESTEST E100 - E200 Series. In Proceedings of Building Simulation.
[17] Ghatti V. (2003). Experimental validation of the EnergyPlus low-temperature radiant simulation. Transactions, 109(2), 614-623.
[18] EnergyPlus Testing with ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 140-2001
[19] EnergyPlus Testing with HVAC BESTEST Part 1 - Tests E100 to E200
[20] DesignBuilder v6 Compliance With ANSI/ASHRAE/ACCA Standard 183-2007
[21] ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 140-2017 Building Thermal Envelope and Fabric Load Tests  DesignBuilder v6.1 with EnergyPlus v8.9 27 Jan 2021
[22] ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 140-2017 Space-Cooling Equipment Performance Analytical Verification Tests AE101 to AE445 DesignBuilder v6.1 with EnergyPlus v8.9 27 Jan 2021
[23] ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 140-2017
[24] Space-Cooling Equipment Performance Analytical Verification Tests CE100 to CE200 DesignBuilder v6.1 with EnergyPlus v8.9 27 Jan 2021
[25] ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 140-2017 Space-Heating Equipment Performance Tests
[26] HE100 to HE230 DesignBuilder v6.1 with EnergyPlus v8.9 27 Jan 2021

  • تاریخ دریافت 09 اسفند 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 06 تیر 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 10 تیر 1404